So your rebuttal on the trespass letter is:
"The lawyers will work out our individual cases We have received no word from the courts about being banned."
Now I know the language might be confusing, but perhaps your lawyers can explain it to me:
§ 143‑318.17. Disruptions of official meetings.
A person who willfully interrupts, disturbs, or disrupts an official meeting and who, upon being directed to leave the meeting by the presiding officer, willfully refuses to leave the meeting is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor. (1979, c. 655, s. 1; 1993, c. 539, s. 1028; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c).)
Your rebuttal also noted:
"No matter how he and the other five ideologues..."
Which one of your buddies has jumped ship in recent days? I'll ready the welcome wagon.